By PVG viagra
The Cosmic Background Radiation
March 20, 2008 on 2:05 am | In big bang |
This was the third and final piece of the puzzle that led to the acceptance of the Big Bang and the rejection of all alternatives: the discovery of the background radiation left over from the Big Bang.
The “leading theory” before this was discovered was the Steady-State theory. Sure, they knew of Hubble Expansion. But they hemmed and hawed and said, “well, the Universe is expanding, but there must be something that happens that keeps creating new matter for free, and that’s why the Universe can expand in a steady-state theory.” So, they made one thing up to explain that (which violates the conservation of energy, by the way).
Then there were the light elements. They said, “Oh, well, since we make most of the heavy elements in stars, we can make the light ones, too, probably.” This was a young field, so they didn’t know that no, they couldn’t make that much helium that quickly.
But the Big Bang predicted leftover radiation. After all, if it was hot and dense, and all the Universe did was expand, then that radiation doesn’t just disappear, it sticks around, but evolves with the Universe, and becomes cold and diffuse. But they didn’t see it. Know why? It’s relatively faint, and you need a big antenna to see it. But a couple of guys from Bell Labs had a big antenna, and they were pointing it at different points in the sky. And they found there was this noise that you couldn’t get rid of, at about 3 Kelvin in Temperature. What the heck was it?
Well, their first guess was there was something dirty in the antenna. So they went up there, and it turned out it was filled with pigeon droppings.

So they cleaned it all out, and then looked again. Well, there was still all this noise! Everywhere in the sky! So they called up the smart guys at Princeton, who told them, “Oh-my-God you found the leftover radiation from the big bang!” So they got a Nobel Prize, and the guys from Princeton didn’t!
By chance, I met Arno Penzias (one of the two guys who found the leftover radiation) in Italy back in 2004, who told me most of this story. When they discovered this leftover radiation more than 40 years ago, people very quickly realized that the Big Bang was the only theory that explained this, the light elements, and the Hubble Expansion. That remains true to the present day. But one of the saddest stories is that of Fred Hoyle, who just couldn’t believe that his beautiful steady-state theory was wrong, and until his death in 2003, kept claiming, “We live in a fog,” referring to the cosmic microwave background as that mysterious fog.
Lesson? Learn from the evidence around you. And now you know all three reasons why the Big Bang is the only theory we have that explains why the Universe is the way it is!
14 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^ Powered by TopSoftware4Download.com with a personally modified jd-nebula-3c theme design.

LOVE the pic of the pigeon! I have to wonder now what your opinion is of string theory and the idea of a “multiverse”. Sorry, I’ve been reading Parallel Worlds by Michio Kaku and Endless Universe by Paul J. Steinhardt and Neil Turok. That’s just my humble mind’s automated response to these latest posts. :}
Comment by Nipper — March 20, 2008 #
[…] loved his Steady-State Theory so much that he refused to accept the Big Bang, even when the evidence became overwhelming. And the evidence became overwhelming in 1964; Hoyle railed on against the Big Bang until his death […]
Pingback by ScienceBlogs Channel : Physical Science | BlogCABLE.COM — June 25, 2009 #
Thanks for post. Nice to see such good ideas.
Comment by Zashkaser — August 5, 2009 #
Неплохая подборка в блоге, хорошо сделано, автору спс.
Comment by Plovdiy — August 10, 2009 #
Vaio P Has Finally Arrived For KD319
Comment by vitya — September 6, 2009 #
Use ISO to Take Low-Light Photos
Comment by venedikta — September 7, 2009 #
Just passing some time in between class on Ezine articles and I found your post. Not normally what I enjoy to read about, but it surely was well worth my time. Thanks.
Comment by Ismael Weingarten — July 16, 2011 #
I would like to thank you for this wonderful site!! I undoubtedly enjoyed every little bit of it. I’ve bookmarked you to take a look at new stuff you put up. Thanks
Comment by Jamison Vadenais — July 16, 2011 #
LOVE the pic of the pigeon! I have to wonder now what your opinion is of string theory and the idea of a “multiverse”. Sorry, I’ve been reading Parallel Worlds by Michio Kaku and Endless Universe by Paul J. Steinhardt and Neil Turok. That’s just my humble mind’s automated response to these latest posts. :}
Comment by tłumaczenie rosyjski — July 29, 2011 #
I and also my buddies happened to be reading through the great solutions on your web blog and the sudden came up with a terrible feeling I had not expressed respect to the site owner for those secrets.
Comment by Alec Riddlebarger — September 6, 2011 #
Many thanks for sharing your plus a glorious information Interesting site. I really like it Hello, Thanks for a great post and interesting commentsassistance informatique interesting topic, I am very fortunate to be able to come to your website and i also will borkmark this site so that I possibly could keep coming back another time, if you learn ebook or manual reference ebook you can travel to my blog at download free pdf ebook. baju muslim guzel paylasm tskler nice facts about this site/article,thx for sharing. Btw i am budisunardi im a web marketing i love to sell an asphalt sealing equipment by my website just look it over.
Comment by party banners — December 29, 2011 #
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
Comment by Freeda Gulotta — January 5, 2012 #
Replica handbags: cheap Chanel replica hand bags, fake Chanel handbag, Chanel replica bag, Chanel knockoff handbags, Chanel bag replicas
Comment by management leadership training — January 5, 2012 #
With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement? My blog has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my agreement. Do you know any ways to help protect against content from being stolen? I’d definitely appreciate it.
Comment by seo — January 31, 2012 #