Can the Moon Help Solve Earth’s Problems?
January 2, 2009 on 3:13 pm | In Astronomy, Solar System |
As we begin 2009, I’d like to take a look at one of the biggest problems facing humanity: the fact that the human presence on Earth is really affecting the planet Earth itself. We can see this by looking at the planet at night, and finding that it’s still lit up due to the human presence:

We can see this by looking at, just over the last 60 years and projected into the future, how the human population on Earth continues to rise:

But I’d like to ask a question to everybody:
How many humans can the planet support before we need to either reduce the population or expand to other worlds?
We’ve already talked about how forests and wild places are needed to remove Carbon Dioxide from the atmosphere and reverse global warming, but let’s put that aside. We’ve got lots of arable land on this planet, and as the population goes up, more and more of that land is needed for farming, to feed the world. In order to do that, we need fewer forests:

And we need to take that land and turn it into farmland for production of staple foods:
The Earth currently produces staple foods (rice, grains, cereals, potatoes, etc.) in quantities of 2,264 million metric tonnes per year, enough to feed about 10 billion people assuming everyone eats a 2,000 calorie-per-day diet. One third of those grains go towards feeding animals, which is horrendously inefficient, bringing the food total down to about enough to feed 7 billion people. We’re close to that already (about 6.7 billion), and we’re already using about half of all the arable land in the world.
So assuming we want to do the following:
- Keep our forests,
- Continue reproducing, and
- Continue feeding ourselves (and eating the good food, too),
what are our options? We clearly need more land, and we clearly can’t take any more from Earth, as we need more wild places and forests to help repair the damage that’s already been done. Where should we look?

The Moon. That’s right, the Moon. You think I’m being ridiculous, but this is a reasonable, powerful long-term goal. And this is a problem that quick-fixes won’t ameliorate; we need a long-term solution. This is part of the reason why there’s such an initiative to go back to the Moon, because if we can get crops to grow on the Moon, we’ll have just as much arable land there as we have here, even though the Moon has only 7.5% of the surface area of the Earth, because not all of the Earth is land, and not all of the Earth’s land is arable.
You might think I’m talking crazy, but these aren’t my words.
“The Moon is a place where you can study how to expand life beyond Earth,” the European Space Agency’s senior scientist Bernard Foing told BBC News.
“You can take the elements needed and seed, germinate, grow and make a flower blossom on the Moon,” Professor Foing explained.
“We also have ideas about taking other types of plants that could make a first generation “mini biosphere”, from which we could grow more complex plants.
“From this, we could learn how to develop a self-sufficient life support system that could help us live off the (lunar) land.”
And the part about growing flowers on the Moon? We’ve already covered that; that’s part of something we’re able to do today. Can you imagine, by the time we’re old men and women, a world where humans live on more than one rock in our Solar System? It’s a great dream, and a great thing to be hopeful for, as a long-term vision, as we begin our new year.
And while you think about that, check out both the new Carnival of Space, done on the cheap over at Cheap Astro, and the top 100 space and astronomy blogs, in no particular order, where I come in at number 47. And finally, for a little old-school perspective on our place in the Universe, I leave you with the old Monty Python song about the Universe:
4 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^ Powered by TopSoftware4Download.com with a personally modified jd-nebula-3c theme design.

Hey Ethan,
You’re right that feeding grain to ruminant animals is terrifically wasteful for many reasons. Cows grazing on pasture actually have a positive environmental impact. Their food source grows wild with no synthetic fertilizer, so no fossil fuels or other energy inputs are required. Unlike that of grain-fed cows in a confinement operation, their manure does not need to be trucked away and disposed; instead it provides a natural fertilizer for the soil. The rich topsoil that ruminants help build under grasslands is actually our largest land-based carbon sink, so it’s wrong to think that we need forests covering as much land as possible. The key is turning around our industrialized agriculture system.
And I completely agree about omnivory. It is extremely difficult to maintain optimal health without consuming any animal products. In fact, there were no traditional cultures that were vegetarian, which strongly suggests that humans evolved to be obligate omnivores. All pre-modern cultures highly valued animal products and knew how especially important they are in pregnancy and development. There were even a few that subsisted almost entirely on animal products and enjoyed outstanding health, for example, the Inuit of the Arctic and the Masai of Kenya and Tanzania. For more on the diets of these two peoples see these excellent articles:
Inuit
Masai
Tom
Comment by Tom — January 2, 2009 #
Funny - and here I thougt the best soltion would be to get people to STOP EFFING BREEDING.
It’s interesting to see that NA is barely project to stop growing by 2050.
Comment by Sili — January 4, 2009 #
Don’t forget the ridiculous concept of bio-fuels. They might be OK if we can manufacture them outside of current agricultural space, but currently, we are using food for fuel.
I remember being in elementary school in the 70’s (yes, I’m old…) and reading that we would have permanent settlements on the moon by the year 2000.
Comment by Kendall — January 6, 2009 #
the pix of the earth at night is the coolest thing i have ever seen in my life i would love to be an asternot now
Comment by victoria — November 17, 2009 #