adobe photoshop 6 book Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium software download adobe photoshop lightroom crack leagal adobe photoshop software for cheap Adobe InCopy CS5 for Mac software download actualizacion adobe illustrator 10 download adobe acrobat tryout crack Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 software download adobe illustrator cs2 12.0.0 crackz serialz adobe acrobat 70 professional free download Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 software download adobe photoshop elements 5.0 scrapbook download adobe acrobat standard Adobe Creative Suite 5 Design Premium software download adobe illustrator demos 5.0 acrobat adobe download free reader Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended software download adobe illustrator parallogram total training for adobe photoshop cs Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection software download adobe creative suite academic adobe photoshop cs3 mac keygen Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Extended software download scrolling in adobe illustrator downloading software acrobat adobe form client Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 software download adobe photoshop cs2 filters serial number adobe acrobat 6.0 Adobe Illustrator CS5 software download adobe photoshop killer tips

Special Relativity and Paris Hilton

November 7, 2008 on 2:50 pm | In Physics, relativity |

Are you kidding me? Who ever thought that Paris Hilton and Albert Einstein would be in the same sentence, much less have things to say on the same topic?

And yet, here we are in 2008, and theweek.com reports the following:

Paris Hilton is worried about Einstein’s relativity theory. The hotel heiress is one of 157 people to have already paid a $200,000 deposit for a seat on Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic commercial space-flight service, but this week confessed to being “very scared” that if the spaceship flies too fast, its passengers will experience relativity’s predicted distortion in the passage of time. “With the whole ‘light-years’ thing, what if I come back 10,000 years later and everyone I know is dead?” said Hilton. “I’ll be like, ‘Great. Now I have to start all over.’”

Want to know the amazing thing? Paris Hilton has nailed one of the most important concepts in all of physics! She’s right, when you move close to the speed of light, time slows down for you. If you go on a spaceship, travel close to the speed of light, and come back to Earth, you’ll only age a little bit, but people on Earth will age much more.

Let’s take a look at just how this works. The main idea is that light always moves at a constant speed. If I send you a light beam, it gets to you in a certain amount of time. But if we’re moving very quickly, that light beam is limited by the speed of light. We’ll see the same amount of time pass, but really, because everything is moving so quickly, time passes at a slower rate. Take a look at the illustration below, where the green side (on the left) is someone at rest, while the red side (on the right) is moving close to the speed of light.

See how it takes light more time to travel on the right? That’s what we mean when we say that it appears that time slows down when you move close to the speed of light. But there’s a caveat that Paris missed:

You have to move close to the speed of light!

And this is the problem. While you can check out an online calculator about time dilation, the fact is that the puny spacecrafts that we build don’t move anywhere close to the speed of light. The best tests we’ve ever done show that time slows down, but for any Earth vehicles, the effects are, at most, a few seconds. So don’t sweat it, Paris, we’ll still know you when you come back.

But, if you want a little bit more in the way of details, check out this video…


12 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. All the color has left Herr Professor Einstein’s face as he looks at little Pairee Hilton and contemplates “Mein Gott, das ist hot”. I sure hope he doen’t drop everything and forgets to write all of his annalis mirablis. Meanwhile, little Pairee Hilton, what beauty, what brains. When she goes for her space ride I want to hear her say “That’s hot!”

    Comment by mark a. thomas — November 7, 2008 #

  2. Pretty sure Marilyn had a better grasp of the details of SR.

    Comment by Sili — November 8, 2008 #

  3. […] here: Special Relativity and Paris Hilton Share and […]

    Pingback by Special Relativity and Paris Hilton — GossipMax — November 8, 2008 #

  4. […] Madam is dus bang na haar vlucht ergens terecht te komen in het jaar twaalfduizend en nog wat. Hihihi… Nou, ze heeft in ieder geval begrepen dat ruimtevluchten in staat zijn om verschil te maken in de klok van een op aarde achtergebleven waarnemer en die van haar in de SpaceshipTwo. Máár we kunnen haar geruststellen, want de snelheid waarmee de SS2 voortbeweegt is niets in vergelijking met de lichtsnelheid. Want alleen in de buurt van de lichtsnelheid zullen tijdseffecten op gaan treden en zal ze inderdaad na een ritje in de verre toekomst belanden. Stel dat ze met de SS2 zo’n 40.000 km per uur gaat en ze vliegt 8 uren rond, dan zal ze 3/1000e seconde in de toekomst zijn beland. Nou, dat valt toch reuze mee? Bron: Starts with a bang. […]

    Pingback by Paris Hilton over relativiteit en Astroblogs — November 16, 2008 #

  5. […] only travel forward by hundredths of a second after months in space. In order to travel forward a significant amount of time, you need to move close to the speed of light. This is something we can do for subatomic particles […]

    Pingback by How to build a time machine? | Starts With A Bang! — January 14, 2009 #

  6. Kepler (demolish) Vs Einstein’s

    Ending Einstein’s space jail of time in 2009 that led to fraud Symbol E=mc²

    Areal velocity is constant: r² θ’ =h Kepler’s Law

    h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity
    r² θ’= h = S² w’

    S = r exp (ỉ wt); h = [r² Exp (2iwt)] w’=r²θ’
    w’ = (θ’) exp [-2(i wt)]

    w’= (h/r²) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = (h/r²) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)]
    w’ = w’(x) + ỉ w’(y) ; w’(x) = (h/r²) [ 1- 2sine² (wt)]

    Δ w’= w’(x) – (h/r²) = - 2(h/r²) sine² (wt) = - 2(h/r²) (v/c) ² v/c=sine wt
    (h/ r²)(Perihelion/Periastron)= [2πa.a√ (1-ε²)]/Ta² (1-ε) ²= [2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²
    Δ w’ = [w’(x) – h/r²] = -4π {[√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radian per second

    {x [180/π;degrees]x[100years=36526days;century]x[3600;seconds in degree]
    Δ w” = (-720×36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² seconds of arc per century

    This Kepler’s Equation solves all the problems Einstein and all physicists could not solve
    DI Her Binary starts systems

    The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- –.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) v=√ [G m M / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<>Exp (ì w t) ———->> S=r Exp (ì wt) Nahhas’ Equation
    Orbit——–>> Orbit light sensing——>> Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential
    Particle —->> light sensing of moving objects———— >> Wave
    Newton———>>light sensing———->> Quantum
    Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects
    Quantum - Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions
    E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c
    m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time
    S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects
    P = visual velocity = change of visual location
    P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)
    = (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr
    E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2
    = m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)
    = mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]
    =ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed
    wt = π/2
    E (visual) = ìmv² (1 - 2 + 0)
    E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit) If v = c
    w t = π/4
    E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c
    wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 - ln2
    Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [ln(1/2)]=[-ỉ (1/2)]
    E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c
    Conclusion: E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2 joenahhas1958@yahoo.com. All rights reserved.
    PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then
    E=1/2m (m v + m’ r) ² = (1/2m) (m’ r) ²; v = 0
    E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m’ r =mc
    E=mc²/2

    Comment by Joe nahhas — January 28, 2009 #

  7. Einstein’s Physics Dollar Store on Campus
    MIT Harvard Cal-Tech
    Sponsored by NASA
    Why Relativity theory is not Physics and why Einstein’s “thought” = 0
    Walking the walk and talking the talk taking on all space-time confusion of physics by
    MIT Harvard and Cal-Tech and all other Physics dollar stores departments
    And why LHC burned itself

    Visual Effects and the confusions of “Modern” physics

    r ——— Light sensing of moving objects ——- S
    Actual object—– Light ——— Visual object
    r - ——-cosine (wt) + i sine (wt) - S = r [cosine (wt) + i sine (wt)]
    Newton– Kepler’s time visual effects — Time dependent Newton
    Particle ————– Visual effects ——————– Wave

    Line of Sight: r cosine wt

    r ——————- r cosine (wt) line of sight light aberrations

    A moving object with velocity v will be visualized by
    light sensing through an angle (wt);w = constant and t= time
    Also, sine wt = v/c; cosine wt = √ [1-sine² (wt) = √ [1-(v/c) ²]

    A visual object moving with velocity v will be seen as S

    S = r [cosine (wt) + i sine (wt)] = r Exp [i wt]; Exp = Exponential

    S = r [√ [1-(v/c) ²] + ỉ (v/c)] = S x + i S y

    S x = Visual along the line of sight = r [√ [1-(v/c) ²]

    This Equation is special relativity length contraction formula
    And it is just the visual effects caused by light aberrations of a
    moving object along the line of sight.

    In a right angled velocity triangle A B C: Angle A = wt; angle B = 90°; Angle C = 90° -wt
    AB = hypotenuse = c; BC = opposite = v; CA= adjacent = c √ [1-(v/c) ²]

    Comment by Alexander Nahhas — February 7, 2009 #

  8. […] We’ve talked before about how you can make time around you speed up. Go into a spaceship, travel close to the speed of light, and come back to where you started. When you land your spaceship, you will have aged “normally” for you, but everyone who remained on Earth (even your identical twin) will be much older. […]

    Pingback by Can you slow time down? | Starts With A Bang! — February 18, 2009 #

  9. Okay, I’m not totally convinced by this explination. Why does the time dilation effect the space crafts aswell? Shouldn’t it mean the laser appears to go slower while the craft continues its speed from that particular perspective? Why should the laser effect the time of the crafts as well, the laser is moving completely seperate.

    Comment by Nathan Williams — February 19, 2010 #

  10. Hallo liebe liebe leute was geht bei euch grad so ab

    Comment by Test — April 25, 2010 #

  11. besuche doch mal alle http://www.google.de

    Comment by Test — April 25, 2010 #

  12. great post about paris hilton, I think she is actually quite smart, press wise. We have been compiling a list of official leaked videos of her. She sure knows out to create free press.

    Comment by paris exposed — May 8, 2010 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^ Powered by TopSoftware4Download.com with a personally modified jd-nebula-3c theme design.